Human Resources >>>

Foreign and Malay companies discriminate against Malay graduates more than Chinese companies

“It was also found that discrimination against Malay applicants is highest among foreign-controlled companies, followed by Malay-controlled companies, then Chinese-controlled companies.”

This study rebuts many Malays who blame Chinese companies discriminated Malay graduates. Perkasa must hold a protest against foreign and Malay companies for more discrimination against Malay graduates.

Actually most Malay-controlled listed companies hire non-Malays to run their business for a simple reason, money matter. No profit-oriented companies hire someone regardless your race who cannot make money for them.

A MNC I worked for in Penang only hired Malay graduates from overseas universities after trial and error hiring process. Those Malay graduates from foreign universities having better working attitude than local Malay graduates.

Anyway, Sri Lankan graduates are the worst attitude workers in my memory.

Malay grads losing out in job ‘race’
Teoh El Sen | November 2, 2012

A new study discovers that Malay graduates stand a lesser chance in being called up for an interview compared to their Chinese counterparts.

PETALING JAYA: Does race matter in securing an interview?

Apparently so, according to a new study which found that a Malay fresh graduate was 16.7% less likely to be called up for a job interview in the private sector compared to their Chinese counterparts.

The study, funded by the University Malaya Research Grant, was jointly conducted by Lee Hwok Aun, a senior lecturer from the Department of Development Studies at Universiti Malaya (UM) and Muhammed Abdul Khalid, a Research Fellow at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaya (UKM).

The academic paper was presented at a public seminar in UM this morning.

Both researches said they aim to “empirically and objectively” investigate racial discrimination in the private sector labour market in the Peninsular Malaysia, which was talked about but its prevalence not studied.

However, they stressed that the focus was on incidences of discrimination and not on the reasons behind it, including racism, prejudice or bigotry.

The “first of its kind” study was based on a field experiment where fictitious resumes of Malay and Chinese applicants were sent to job advertisements in Peninsular Malaysia.

A total of 3,012 resumes were sent to 753 engineering and accounting jobs advertised on and between August and December 2011.

For each job, the researchers sent out four fake resumes according to race and their academic qualifications. All the “applicants” were male with no prior working experience but have a basic qualification in the field being applied for.

The number of responses from employers, which have been divided into “Chinese-controlled, Malay-controlled or foreign-controlled”, are then recorded for each category.

One of the main findings of the study was that the total resumes sent, only 13.1%(396) received callbacks, of those, 4.2%(63) were Malay and 22.1%(222) were Chinese. The study also found that the quality of applicants appeared to matter more for Malays than for the Chinese.

There was also a difference between industries, where engineering companies were responding to 25% of resumes by Chinese applicants and only 3% of resumes by Malay applicants while in accountancy, a lesser 19% Chinese applicants received callbacks compared to 6% of Malay applicants.

It was also found that discrimination against Malay applicants is highest among foreign-controlled companies, followed by Malay-controlled companies, then Chinese-controlled companies.

Malay firms discriminating Malays?

Interestingly, Malay applicants applying to Chinese-controlled engineering firms are more likely to be called back than if they applied to Malay-controlled firms. A Chinese applying to a Malay company also has about the same chances as a Malay candidate.

Employers that stipulate Chinese language proficiency as a job requirement also favour Chinese applicants. Chinese-controlled and foreign-controlled companies are significantly inclined toward Chinese resumes.

“The data do not directly inform the motivation of the observed discrimination. Nonetheless, our findings suggest that employers are generally predisposed favourably toward Chinese, substantially due to compatibility factors and unobservable qualities not revealed in job applications, and are more selective toward Malays, which results in fewer but considerably qualified applicants getting callbacks.”

“This study underscores the complexity of labour market discrimination and its policy implications,” said the study.

“So are opportunity being denied to quality Malays? Surely to some extend, but we do not how how prevalent it is. Some companies may discriminate at pre-employment stage but it is likely to be lesser after one is employed,” asked Lee.

During the briefing, Lee admitted that further studies should be conducted on the matter as it was a complex issue.

“Chinese and Malays are the frontier and while we did consider also including Indians, we regrettably could not due to budget and other constraints,” he said.

He also said that the team had wanted to study the public sector but were unable to due to the application process in the civil service.

In the presentation, Lee and Muhammed Abdul also suggested that the government could look into having a Equal Opportunity Act & Equal Opportunity Commission but warned that a legislation of that nature must cover both private and public sector and should not impose a quota system.

“We are also calling for a critical examination of ourselves… trying to get people to think of the greater good. While I believe that employers are making informed decisions, suppose basing their choices on experience, and not just assumptions and ignorance, we cannot say for certain if racism is one of the factors, we cannot be quick to condemn.”

The comment board with Facebook account.