Politics >>>

Hadi Awang vs. Nik Aziz. What make them different?

Hadi Awang puts Malay nationalism above Islam while Nik Aziz puts Islam above Malay nationalism.

Islam in Malaysia is not highy complimented and rated by non-bumis because Malay nationalism, not the universal islamic values are practised.

25,000 Jewish citizens in Iran are given an uncontested parliament seat for the community to voice their concerns and they can consume alcohol freely. This really change my perception on Islamic state in Iran.

Communism >>>

Police pratises double standard again?

I have no objection on any peaceful demonstration, but did they apply for police permit?

Ibrahim Ali is number two Malay ultra after Najib.

He shall call another demo to protest Lee Kuan Yew’s visit to Kelantan afterall Lee took away a portion of Tanah Melayu while Chin Peng did not.

2,000 demonstrate against Chin Peng’s return

KOTA BARU Two thousand members of the Kelantan People’s Action Council (MTRK) and People’s Champion and Service Centre (PKMR)held a peaceful demonstration Saturday to oppose the suggestion to allow former Malayan Communist Party (MCP) secretary-general Chin Peng to return to the country.

The hour-long demonstation in front of the Grand Riverview Hotel was led by MTRK president and Pasir Mas MP Datuk Ibrahim Ali.

He told reporters that he supported the government’s decision not to allow Chin to return home because he was regarded as a murderer and a traitor.

Penang Gerakan chairman Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan had called on the government to allow Chin Peng to return on humanitarian grounds because the former communist leader was no longer a threat to national security. – Bernama

Race Relations >>>

Malay ultras ask, “The Indonesians, Papua New Guinea and may be in the Soloman Islands many Chinese concerns have been attacked. Why?”

WHY?
Because these countries are under a racist regime who cannot manage their economy and feed their own people.

The truths are

- Chinese in these countries got no guns to rob native people unlike the white people in Australia and America.

- Chinese in these countries make their wealth through hardwork and business acuman.

- Chinese only practising their culture and religion and never attempted to convert local people,

Why Chinese is attacked by local people?

Because Chinese are stupid not to arm themselves like the Communist Party of Malaya and protect themselves with guns. So, they are lambs and easy scapegoat to divert problems of racist government like UMNO Nazi.

Why native people did not attack whitemen?

Because whitemen killed them all without mercy if local people tried to attack them.

The philosophy is a robber robs a defenseless rich man and then the robber blames the rich man for his own sin.

Communism >>>

Major (Rtd) D Swami, no way Malaysia can defeat the communists

LTTE was defeated because Indian government totally washed their hands off after Rajiv Ghandi was murdered by LTTE.

Thailand government was (is) closing one eye to let CPM freely roaming in their backyard for decades. This is reciprocal reaction to Malaysia supporting Pattani Malay rebels. Besides, CPM is still receiving financial and weapon supports from China government.

Major D Swanmi, Mahathir is not stupid as you. Without the peace agreement, the risk of doing business in Malaysia is too high for foreign investors.

We never ‘defeated’ the communists

Major (Rtd) D Swami | Jun 3, 09 4:47pm

I refer to the Malaysiakini report Create a ‘heroes and traitors’ museum.

Omar Mohd Hashim of the Malaysian History Association (PSM) is living in his own deluded world. Yes, as a former soldier from a very well-blooded regiment, I too stand with other soldiers in not allowing Chin Peng to settle in Malaysia.

I, too, have friends who were maimed and killed during the insurgency. I say Osman Mohd Hashim is deluded is because he says, ‘This was the first time that an independent country had managed to defeat the communists’.

Well, we did not defeat the communists if one were to read and understand the peace treaty. The treaty is titled ‘Agreement Between The Government Of Malaysia And The Communist Party Of Malaya To Terminate Hostilities’ which is a historic document.

The operative word here is ‘Cessation of Hostilities’. I cannot and did not see the word surrender in the document. We did not defeat them, we could have decimated them to the last man, if not for the capitulation of Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

It states in Para 3.2 that ‘Members of the Communist Party of Malaya and members of its disbanded armed units, who are not of Malaysian origin, may be allowed to settle down in Malaysia in accordance with the laws of Malaysia, if they so desire’.

It is an international treaty. Our so-called Great Leader, Mahathir had this treaty negotiated without a referendum from the Malaysian people. But then he was a dictator, surrounded by sycophants and apple-polishers.

On the Jan 6, 1956 on a mountain top in Malaya, Tunku abdul Rahman, John Davis, a senior district officer in the government of Malaya, Singapore’s Chief Minister David Marshall and Sir Cheng-Lock Tan, president of the Malayan Chinese Association, met Chin Peng.

The Tunku asked this of Chin Peng, that the Communists would only be allowed to return, if they surrendered, disbanded their armed forces, and abolished the Communist Party.

After their surrender they would each be subjected to a loyalty investigation and would be restricted to a specific area of the country, but once investigated, most would be allowed to enter political life again so long as they did not pursue a communist line. Said Chin Peng: ‘I and my people will never submit to investigation’.

Singapore’s David Marshall responded by saying this: ‘As a human being, I ask you to realise that there are seven million people people in Malaya and 3,000 communists. I appeal to you to think of their welfare and to accept the sacrifice of your pride in the mild humiliation which you state is implied in the investigation of the loyalty of MCP members before their release.’

Chin Peng responded: ‘To report to the police means surrender’.

Snapped the Tengku: ‘I will never give in, so you must give in.’

Replied Chin Peng: ‘The amnesty means surrender. Surrender means humiliation. We will not accept surrender at any time. We will carry on the struggle to the last man.’

The Tunku was a warrior at heart and not a quitter. The communists did not surrender, period. We could have defeated them but then the Chief of Armed Forces, General Hashim Ali was the brother-in-law of our ‘Great Leader’. The IGP was Mohd Haniff Omar. Can I say, I blame him for capitulating to this dastardly parchment?

The army which bore the brunt of the fighting was one of the most experienced counter- insurgency fighting forces in jungle warfare, and I may be so bold as to add, in the world.

We could have totally defeated them in the same way the Sri Lankans did to Vellupillai Prabhakaran. We would not be spending our time and energy discussing Chin Peng’s return today, nor would our ‘Great Leader’ have embarked on a policy of marginalising certain segments of the Malaysian population.

He capitualted for expediency. So who did actually surrender? Mahathir went against everything the Tunku wanted as far as the CPM was concerned.

In his reasoning he fails to discuss the double standards. See images of our enemies with Malaysian VIPs. See more double standards here where an enemy of ours, Shamsieh Fakeh and her family applied to the Malaysian government for permission to return to the country from 1985 onwards.

People like Omar Mohd Hashim of the Malaysian History Association (PSM), should just keep quiet. I know there are many like him who push forth their own agenda and who ignominiously have no problems with double standards.

The message to him should be to stop insulting the intelligence of the soldiers and civillians alike.

Politics >>>

The twisted facts in “Melayu dikhianati?”

- The present Thailand Prime Minister is a Chinese descendant and more than a half of their ministers are Chinese descendants.

- Tamils are citizens in Sri Lanka since 1948. The civil war was due to one language only and affirmative policy on Sinhalese.

- Chinese are citizens in Vietnam before Vietnamese communists at loggerhead with Chinese communists in 1979. Those Chinese stay in the Vietnam are still Vietnam citizens except they are discriminated as Chinese in Malaysia.

- Two provinces in Northern Myanmar are governed by Chinese-descendant governors with their own army. Mynmar military junta is not only anti-Chinese, they are anti-people as well.

- More non-Malay soldiers including Chinese received “pingat gagah pahlawan” from Malaysian government. A big framed photo in a hall at Royal Military College to honour hero in fighting communist is an Iban soldier, not Malay soldier.

Thank Utusan for more such anti-Chinese and anti-Indian articles because I am quite worry Chinese and Indian swing back to BN.

Melayu dikhianati?

Hati Awang semakin hari semakin ditoreh-toreh oleh tuntutan pelbagai pihak bukan Melayu yang bersikap terlalu rasis selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-12. Kita boleh tafsir apa sebabnya. Awang tidak mahu mengulas panjang kali ini, cukup sekadar disiarkan semula petikan kenyataan seorang pemimpin MCA, Tun Tan Siew Sin pada 30 April 1969 (dipetik daripada buku Khalid Awang Osman dan pernah diulas Ridhuan Tee Abdullah) untuk renungan kita semua.

”Orang Melayu menerusi UMNO bermurah hati melonggarkan syarat-syarat dalam undang-undang negara ini sehinggakan dalam masa 12 bulan selepas kemerdekaan, 90 peratus penduduk bukan Melayu menjadi warganegara. Ini berbeza dengan keadaan sebelum merdeka di mana 90 peratus daripada mereka masih tidak diiktiraf sebagai rakyat Tanah Melayu walaupun hampir 100 tahun hidup di bawah pemerintahan penjajah. Sebagai membalas kemurahan hati orang Melayu, MCA dan MIC bersetuju meneruskan dasar memelihara dan menghormati kedudukan istimewa orang Melayu dan dalam masa yang sama mempertahankan kepentingan-kepentingan sah kaum lain”.

Sebelum itu, seorang pemimpin MIC Tun V.T Sambanthan pada 1 Jun 1965 pernah berkata: ”Pada tahun 1955 kita telah memenangi pilihan raya dengan majoriti yang tinggi, selanjutnya mendapat kemerdekaan dalam masa dua tahun kemudian. Dalam jangka masa itu, kita terpaksa berbincang dan menangani pelbagai perkara termasuk soal kewarganegaraan. Persoalannya di sini, apakah yang dilakukan oleh orang Melayu memandangkan kita bercakap menyentuh perkauman? Apakah yang dilakukan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin Melayu? Mereka mempunyai 88 peratus daripada pengundi menyokong mereka.

Apakah yang mereka putuskan mengenai isu kewarganegaraan? ”Jika kita lihat di serata negara Asia dan Asia Timur, kita akan mendapati kaum India tidak akan diterima di Ceylon dan juga tidak diterima di Burma. Sama halnya dengan kaum Cina, mereka tidak diterima di Thailand, Vietnam, Kemboja dan di negara-negara lain. Apakah bantuan berhubung kewarganegaraan yang mereka peroleh di semua wilayah tersebut?

“Di Burma, seperti yang kita semua sedia maklum, kaum India telah diusir keluar, di Ceylon mereka tidak diberikan taraf warganegara seperti juga di Burma. Saya tahu dan anda juga tahu. Apa yang sedang berlaku di Malaya? Di sini kita mendapati pemimpin Melayu berkata, ”Kita akan menerima mereka sebagai saudara, kita akan berikan mereka sepenuh peluang untuk meneruskan kehidupan di negara ini, kita akan beri mereka peluang untuk menjadi warganegara”. Seterusnya pada tahun 1957, dengan tidak mengambil kira kebolehan berbahasa (Melayu) ribuan orang India, Cina dan Ceylon menjadi warganegara. Seperti yang saya nyatakan, saya amat bernasib baik kerana dilahirkan di negara ini. Di manakah anda boleh berjumpa bangsa yang lebih prihatin, bersopan-santun dan tertib selain daripada bangsa Melayu. Di manakah anda boleh mendapat layanan politik yang baik untuk kaum pendatang? Di manakah dalam sejarah dunia? Saya bertanya kepada anda. Ini adalah fakta. Siapakah anda untuk menjaga keselamatan kami? Saya adalah kalangan 10 peratus kaum minoriti di sini. Tetapi saya amat gembira di sini.”

Persoalannya, kini apakah pengorbanan Melayu dikhianati oleh kaum lain?

-Awang Selamat