Categories

Lynas Issue by Dr.HW Looi >>>

I withdraw my support for Lynas after it taking legal action against FMT and Anti-Lynas Commitee

Note: No reply in Malaysiakini’s comment column because I had terminated my MKini subscription some time ago. The ring is here, not elsewhere.

This does not mean I agree with radioactive argument used by Anti-Lynas NGOs.

As an individual sued by Petronas several years ago and know exactly the pains of being bullied by those cash rich companies, I therefore to withdraw my support for Lynas and will remain neutral in this Lynas issue from today onwards.

===============================================

Dear NK Khoo,

I have decided to join you and withdraw my support for Lynas because I have found out that those people at Lynas are not all that nice and in fact they are rather hostile and this together with the hostility of certain component party of the government makes me feel that it is an exercise of futility to try and support the Lynas company.

Thanking you,

Warmest regards,

And God bless you.

Dato’ Dr Looi

Lynas Issue by Dr.HW Looi >>>

Potassium-40 in banana is more radioactive than Lynas rare earth by-product

These are scientific radioactive facts purposely ignored by anti-Lynas group.

Fact 1: Lynas radioactive residue contain a very low level of radiation at 6 Bq/G.

Fact 2: Banana with natural potassium level of radiation is about 31 Bq/g. [15 Bq for a banana or 0.2Bq/G]

G is for the weight of substance in gram, g is for the weight for natural radioactive material in gram.  [Revised on 5/3/2012, 7.11PM.]

I eats radioactive bananas every week, so what?

Actually, we adult human body contains 250g of potassium and 0.012% is the radioactive beta emitter potassium-40 (half-life 1.3 x 109 yr). Therefore, the activity of potassium-40 in the body is 7600 Bq. Its radioactivity is 500 times stronger than a banana and equivalent to 1.3 Kg Water Leach Purification (WLP) residue from Lynas.

Should we commit suicide for having a small quantity of radioactive substance in our body?

Mind you, Potassium-40 is 62 times more radioactive than Thorium-232. Beta particle in Potassium-40 is more energized than alpha particle from Thorium-232 and it can penetrate through our skin.

Unless you are living in the wooden house, the cements used in your house also has the natural radioactivity from Th-232, Ra-226 and K-40, certain cement has more radioactive doses than Lynas waste.

I have no problem to use Lynas waste to build my house since the cement we used now also has the same level of natural radioactivity if anti-Lynas supporters are willing to pay for the construction cost.

Any taker for my appeal? I am becoming a guinea pig to prove my point is right.

The keyword here is the dose of alpha and beta radioactive particles from Thorium-232 and Potassium-40 are too small and distributed evenly in the huge population for both cases.

A reader points out (the accuracy is subject to expert review)

A miner for Potassium chloride (16.4 Bq/G) would only need to be near the big pile of mine for about 7 hours to exceed the public dose limit of 1 mSv.

This exposure level is same dose of radiation as working 6 months in LAMP or living 500 years near it.

The message here is more radioactive substance is freely sold in the shop and used as a fertilizer for food source like paddy.

http://energyfromthorium.com/tech/physics/activity1/

Don’t let PR politicians and half-cooked environmentalists misleading you for their political agenda. I am anti-BN does not mean I blindly support wrong thing from PR.

Intentionally deleted to avoid confusion on substance and radioactive weights after revision.

I have read and seen a lot of myths from Anti-Lynas activists like

1. Australian government has rejected Lynas rare earth plant in Australia.

Answer: Not true.

2. Lynas choosen Malaysia, not Australia because of hazardous waste disposal issue.

Answer: A half true.

All foreign investors like poor waste management policy in Malaysia for cost saving reason.

My support to Lynas always come with one condition, proper waste management audited by an independent expert panel.

3. Gebeng rare earth processing plant is same with Bukit Merah rare earth.

Answer: Not true.

Rare earth compound composition is varied and in different grade, the radioactive from waste in Bukit Merah is 50 times stronger than Gebeng waste.

4. Lynas plant is the same and as dangerous as nuclear plant in Fukushima.

Answer: A big lie.

Lynas plant is just another mining extraction factory from the rare earth with various toxic chemical processes like in the wafer and solar cell factories in Kedah, Sarawak, Penang , Melaka, etc.

5. All radioactive materials are deadly as Uranium used in the nuclear reactor.

Answer: Not true.

Thorium-232 does not produce dangerous gamma rays, which have high ionising energy, high frequency and short electromagnetic wavelength. So thorium radioactive material will not travel more than a few centimeters in the air and cannot penetrate into your skin like X-ray.

Thorium-232 with a half-life span 14000000000 year means destructive beta and gamma radiations are negligible compared to low energy alpha particles.

6. Thorium can dissolve into rainwater.

Answer: Not true.

Thorium is insoluble in water and the risk of going into food chain is minimal.

7. Environmental pollution in China is due to rare earth plants.

Answer: Not true.

All sort of factories, vehicles and coal-powered plants are main sources of pollution in China due to lack of enforcement on waste management.

8. Thorium can cause cancer.

Answer: True.

Thorium can cause cancer if you eat or inhale it into your body. But, there are more than 1000 types of chemical toxic particulates in the smoke from the cigarette can cause cancer also.

Which source is closer to you and would cause cancer risk to you?

9. Our stadium can collapse, how we trust our government to oversee Lynas waste storage facility?

Answer: Several space shuttles, bridges and dams in America did collapse and kill hundred of people. By this weired logic from green activists and PR politicians, American government should stop carry out any public project.

10.  10,000-20,000 protesters in a rally is “suara rakyat” must be listened and followed by a government.

Answer: Yes, every Malaysian has the right to express opinion openly. Whether a rally is representing the majority Malaysian is still unknown and uncertain for its non-random sampling and biasness.

Opinion is not fact, and those taking opinion as fact is disastrous to human civilization. The collective opinion of 28 million Malaysians cannot change this fact, “no object can travel faster than light speed”.

Please get the experts to study rebuttals from Lynas about anti-Lynas myths before you want to argue with me.

https://www.facebook.com/lynasmalaysia?sk=app_165496300219838

The major natural source of radioactivity in plant tissue is potassium, which in nature contains 0.0117% of the unstable isotope potassium-40 (40K). This isotope decays with a half-life of about 1.25 billion years (4×1016 seconds), and therefore the activity of natural potassium is about 31 Bq/g — meaning that, in one gram of the element, about 31 atoms will decay per second.[2][3] Plants naturally contain other radioactive isotopes, such as carbon-14 (14C), but their contribution to the total activity is much smaller.[citation needed] Since a typical banana contains about half a gram of potassium,[4] it will have an activity of roughly 15 Bq. (Although small in environmental and medical terms, the radioactivity of a few bananas is sufficient to trigger radiation sensors used to detect possible smuggling of nuclear material at U.S. ports.[5])

[Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_equivalent_dose]

Nature & Environment >>>

Humankind only cries after seeing the coffin. The nature will destroy the human civilization...

The green donkeys object nuclear power although the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is rising rapidly from the CO2 released from coal and fossil fuel power plants.

The future generations in 22nd millennium will curse their ancestors in 19th, 20th and 21st millennium are fxxing donkeys to give them a disaster-plagued mother earth.

My reminder will not last that long for future generations to know there some far-sighted people in 2013 to forecast their response for inheriting a sicken earth.

Atmospheric CO2 Hits 400 Parts Per Million Mark

Posted by News Editor in Air/Climate, Latest News, RSS on May 11, 2013 10:52 am / no comments

MAUNA LOA OBSERVATORY, Hawaii, May 11, 2013 (ENS) – For the first time in human history, concentrations of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, CO2, have risen above 400 parts per million, ppm. Many climate scientists warn that 350 ppm is the safe upper limit for CO2 in the atmosphere.

On May 9, the daily mean concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere of Mauna Loa, one of the volcanoes on the Big Island of Hawaii, surpassed 400 parts per million for the first time since measurements began in 1958, when CO2 concentrations averaged 318 ppm.

observatory NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory on the Big Island of Hawaii (Photo courtesy NOAA)

observatory
NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory on the Big Island of Hawaii (Photo courtesy NOAA)

Independent measurements made by both the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography have been approaching this level during the past week. Having two programs independently measure the greenhouse gas provides confidence that the measurements are correct.

It marks an important milestone because Mauna Loa, as the oldest continuous carbon dioxide, CO2, measurement station in the world, is the primary global benchmark site for monitoring the increase of this heat-trapping gas.

“Carbon dioxide pumped into the atmosphere by fossil fuel burning and other human activities is the most significant greenhouse gas contributing to climate change,” said NOAA, announcing the 400 ppm concentration level.

CO2 concentration has increased every year since scientists started making measurements on the slopes of the Mauna Loa volcano. The rate of increase has accelerated since the measurements started, from about 0.7 ppm per year in the late 1950s to 2.1 ppm per year during the last 10 years.

“That increase is not a surprise to scientists,” said NOAA senior scientist Pieter Tans, with the Global Monitoring Division of NOAA’s Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder, Colorado. “The evidence is conclusive that the strong growth of global CO2 emissions from the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas is driving the acceleration.”

During the last 800,000 years, concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere fluctuated between about 180 ppm during ice ages and 280 ppm during interglacial warm periods.

There were around 280 ppm of CO2 in the 19th century atmosphere before the Industrial Revolution, when humans first began releasing large amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere by the burning of fossil fuels.

Today’s rate of increase is more than 100 times faster than the increase that occurred when the last ice age ended.

It was researcher Charles David Keeling of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, who began measuring carbon dioxide at Mauna Loa in 1958, initiating now what is known as the “Keeling Curve.” His son, Ralph Keeling, also a geochemist at Scripps, has continued the Scripps measurement record since his father’s death in 2005.

“There’s no stopping CO2 from reaching 400 ppm,” said Ralph Keeling. “That’s now a done deal. But what happens from here on still matters to climate, and it’s still under our control. It mainly comes down to how much we continue to rely on fossil fuels for energy.”

“At this pace we’ll hit 450 ppm within a few decades,” said the younger Keeling.

“This needs to be a wake-up call,” said Melanie Fitzpatrick, climate scientist at the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists, based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. “Reaching 400 parts per million represents a dire experiment with the climate system. As long as humans have walked the Earth, we’ve never seen carbon dioxide levels this high.”

“If we don’t reduce carbon soon, we may no longer talk about searing summer temperatures, 100-year storms and intense droughts as something unusual because they may be the norm. When I started giving talks on climate change in the early 1990s,” said Fitzpatrick, “I was bemoaning the fact that carbon dioxide levels had reached just over 350 parts per million. Now I only wish for that level.”

In London, Lord Nicholas Stern, head of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change, warns that massive movements of climate refugees, driven from their homes by rising temperatures, will come into conflict with other groups living in cooler, wetter climates.

“When temperatures rise to that level, we will have disrupted weather patterns and spreading deserts,” Lord Stern told “The Guardian” newspaper. “Hundreds of millions of people will be forced to leave their homelands because their crops and animals will have died. The trouble will come when they try to migrate into new lands, however. That will bring them into armed conflict with people already living there. Nor will it be an occasional occurrence. It could become a permanent feature of life on Earth.”

Rising temperatures are shrinking polar ice caps, reducing the amount of solar heat they reflect back out into space. Scientists warn that thawing of the permafrost in Alaska, Canada and Russia could emit even more greenhouse gases, including the potent greenhouse gas methane, further intensifying global warming.

Similar increases of CO2 are seen all over the world by many international scientists. NOAA, which runs a global, cooperative air sampling network, reported last year that all Arctic sites in its network reached 400 ppm for the first time.

These high values were a prelude to what is now being observed at Mauna Loa, a site in the subtropics, this year. Sites in the Southern Hemisphere will follow during the next few years.

The increase in the Northern Hemisphere is always a little ahead of the Southern Hemisphere because most of the emissions driving the CO2 increase take place in the north, NOAA explained.

Once emitted, CO2 added to the atmosphere and oceans remains for thousands of years. Climate changes forced by CO2 depend primarily on cumulative emissions, making it progressively more and more difficult to avoid further substantial climate change.

Scientists estimate that the last time CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere were as high as 400 ppm was probably the Pliocene epoch, between 3.2 million and five million years ago, when Earth’s climate was much warmer than it is today.

Nature & Environment >>>

Earth hour campaign is a garbage

co2

Switch off electricity for an hour in a year is just a public stunt by the green activists and politicians, the campaign has no significant effect on carbon dioxide release to atmosphere if the people believe in burning fossil fuels to generate electricity is more safer and cleaner than nuclear energy.

Those people advocate green renewable energy is a better option than nuclear energy is like the frog living in a boiling pot. Renewable energy will not be a viable source of energy for next 50 years due to its technical and geographical constraints.

The core issue is the clock is ticking and the humankind only got a chance to stop global warming from reaching its threshold point of no return. A 95% of people living on earth now have no chance to see themselves the sicken earth in 2100 caused by them.

The amount of carbon dioxide generated by fossil fuel power plants in the United Kingdom each year can cover the UK’s three islands with a 10-meter thick of CO2 layer. For the same electricity generated by the nuclear powers, the amount of radioactive waste is less than 10 meter cubic.

Myth 1: The nuclear power plant’s radioactive risk is overblown by those people who cannot differentiate what is sunlight radiation and X-ray radiation.

In UK, X-ray machines in the hospitals contribute 14% to its background radioactive while nuclear plants only contribute to 1% and others are from the mother nature and cosmic rays.

Myth 2: Radioactive waste decays take millions or billions years is bad to environment.

That is a half-truth fact given by the Green Himpunan for radioactive waste in the Lynas rare earth processing plant.

The radioactive materials with a half-life span of seconds, days and months are more dangerous and risky to human lives. Proper storage of radioactive waste in the concrete bunkers deep under the earth will mitigate the radioactive risk in a few years, not million years as shouted by Green activists.

The radioactive exposure buffer limit for one year old radioactive waste of nuclear plant is five hours. Literally speaking, you are safe to expose to radioactive waste without protective gear for a few hours in case you dig into the radioactive waste storage bunker for gold.

Myth 3: More deaths in the nuclear plant’s accidents.

The direct casualty in Chernobyl nuclear disaster is 42 rescue workers and 1,800 children suffered thyroid cancers which are considered curable disease. Taking iodine dose in time after radioactive leaking incident will reduce the risk greatly.

There were no casualties caused by radiation exposure in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster.

How many people die due to CO2 and air pollution from the fossil fuel power plants each year?

A Clean Air Task Force study quantifying the deaths and other health affects attributable to the fine particle pollution from power plants finds that over 13,000 deaths each year are attributable to U.S. power plants.

How many deaths in China from the fine particle pollution from fossil fuel power plants?

There is still no scientific answer yet because no study on air pollution effect on the population health and life span in China. The air pollution level in China is beyond the measurement level of current international standard, it may be 50 or 100 times more severe than U.S.

French with 59 operational nuclear plants have more healthier people compared to China and Malaysia. The existence of nuclear power plant has no correlation with the health of local population.

Earth hour campaign is totally nonsense and serve no purpose to save earth from the global warming disaster if the majority people in Malaysia and other nations is still being misguided by the green activists and certain irresponsible politicians like Wang Tak and Lim Guan Eng about the nuclear power.

Lynas Issue by Dr.HW Looi >>>

Prove NST is twisiting Wong Tack's press statement.

anti-lynas

I assume NST is reporting accurately for Wang’s press statement. He is dancing with Anwar’s tone on Lynas issue which I approve it’s a reasonable and logical statement.

His radioactive phobia supporters should be very disappointed for his softening stance against Lynas after being fooled by him for many years.

Wang Tack admitted he was a member for DAP since 2011. Green Himpunan under Wang Tack is a political motivated campaign should not be disputed after the truth is finally revealed. He is a DAP’s mole inserted into the Green Movement.

Green Himpunan Committee already urged him to resign from the chairman post.

Take my word, neither PR or BN will dare to shut down Lynas plant in Kuantan unless they want to offend America and other Western nations who are relying on Lynas for rare metals supply for their military industry.

Malaysia Kini reported the same story.

Himpunan Hijau chairman says Lynas can proceed if safe for public
By ADRIAN LAI AND CARISMA KAPOOR

KUALA LUMPUR: DAP-alligned activist Wong Tack has made an about-turn on his opposition towards the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) project in Gebeng, Pahang.

In a press conference at DAP’s headquarters yesterday, Wong said he agreed with the statement by opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim that the plant would be allowed to operate should a new public inquiry prove it to be safe.

“If there is a transparent process, then any industrial company, including Lynas Corp, can come into the country.

“It is up to Lynas to prove why it should not be closed down,” he told reporters.

Wong Tack stressed that if the Lynas plant complied with all the safety procedures and was proven to be one hundred per cent safe to the public, he had no problems with it operating.

Wong Tack, who is the chairman of anti-Lynas group Himpunan Hijau, claimed that Lynas Corp had come into the country through the” backdoor” and obtained a temporary operating license where many violations had occurred.

“If Lynas can invest in the country and bring about positive economic development through the front door, then why not?” he asked.

Continue reading >> Prove NST is twisiting Wong Tack’s press statement.