Categories

1Malaysia @ BN Project >>>

Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia scheme copied my idea mooted in 2010?

I googled my letters published in the MalaysiaKini and found this below long forgotten letter.

Giving out free cash to poor people is my suggestion to reduce food subsidies. Seemed BN policy makers have taken note of free money suggestion to come out BR1M.

BN may win the election 13 with free BR1M handouts to millions of rakyat. Am I guilty to indirectly support BN?

turkey therapy approach to subsidies

Human Resources >>>

Minimum wage for foreign workers must go on

haves vs have-nots

Lim Guan Eng has accused BN is favored foreigners by giving them same minimum wage with local workers is just another political polemic.

Let say PR is running Federal government after GE13 by keeping its promise to pay RM 1,500 for local workers as listed in the Orange Book. Take my word carefuly, PR will not keep its promise of RM 1,500 minimum wage judging from their responses on RM 900 minimum wage policy implemented by BN government.

In case I were wrong, PR government adjusts the minimum wage to RM 1,500 for all local workers in every sector.

Does PR has political will to deport 3 to 5 million foreign workers to force local employers hire locals only?

Do you think Malaysian employers will hire RM 500 foreign workers or RM 1,500 local workers for a same type of job?

Please use your brain, not your ball to think and talk unless you want to be a politician like Lim Guan Eng and Chua Soi Lek.

Kudos to BN government for adhering to the minimum wage policy for foreign workers after intense pressure from the employers to exempt them from the new policy.

Let me stress here that the minimum wage should be the basic salary excluding allowances, overtime pay, incentives and other fringe benefits for the employees and contract workers.

The minimum wage policy for foreign workers is to force local employers to hire more local workers instead of depending on the seemingly unlimited supply of cheap foreign workers, and go for mechanization and automation for productivity improvement.

The employers from local and foreign companies have been exploiting low wages for the past 30 years and the pathetic result is that 80% of Malaysian household income is still at below RM 3000 per month. The net wages growth for the working class does not correspond with the GDP growth over the last 30 years.

The Gini Coefficient, a missing yet critical economical indicator in the national budget has been exceeded the 0.40 red line for last few years is a sign of uneven and unjust wealth distribution amongst the Malaysians. The World Bank estimated that 80% of our national wealth is in the hands of 15% Malaysians and the income gap for haves and have-nots is at least 20 times.

Bank Negara should publish the Gini Coefficient yearly under the transparency and accountability principle to support economic transformation policy.

Local companies should move out their businesses to any country with cheaper labor cost like Myanmar, Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam, etc. if they find the labor cost is too prohibitive and uncompetitive for them to stay in Malaysia.

It’s high time for Malaysia to focus on high value-added and high technology industries and services to achieve high income nation status and break away from the middle income trap.

PR especially the DAP seems too have backtracked on the minimum wage policy by attending demonstrations organized by local employers to protest against the minimum wage for foreign workers. There is also no demand for a RM1,500 minimum wage at the KL112 rally.

As seen in The Star, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2013/1/18/focus/12591898&sec=focus

This letter by Ashok Kumar in the Star is another good read, Give workers their due share.

Subra: Minimum wage policy will set number of foreign workers

KUALA LUMPUR: The government will review the need for foreign workers in accordance with the recently implemented minimum wage policy as this will promote greater employment opportunities for local workers.

Human Resources Minister Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam said yesterday a special committee under his ministry had been set up to channel foreign workers to sectors that would need their labour or could afford to pay them according to the minimum wage policy.

He was speaking after delivering his keynote address at the 2nd Datacentre Malaysia Conference and Exhibition.

The floor wage of RM900 and RM800 per month for the peninsula and Sabah and Sarawak took effect this month.

“The minimum wage policy will go on and we will not backtrack on it.”

On Tuesday, Deputy Human Resources Minister Datuk Maznah Mazlan had said implementation of the policy was expected to cause about 50,000 foreigners working in petrol stations to lose their jobs this year.

Read more: Subra: Minimum wage policy will set number of foreign workers – General – New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/subra-minimum-wage-policy-will-set-number-of-foreign-workers-1.202881#ixzz2ICCb3M5S

Letter to Newspaper >>>

Muar river pollution is mainly from industrial estates, poultry farms and sewege water

As a Muarian, I welcome the royal call from his Highness Johor Sultan for relocating bus stations and wet market from the riverbank and gazetting old buildings in the Muar city.

Nevertheless, in order to reduce Muar river’s pollution, several areas have to be looked into with a holistic approach by Johor and Federal governments.

For instances,

1. There are no solid wastes and sewage treatment facilities for industrial estates along the Muar river like Pagoh and Gersik Industrial Parks.

2. Untreated animal wastes from the poultry farms in Muar river upstream like in Kepong are discharged directly into river.

3. There are no sewage treatment facilities for small towns, new villages and Malay kampungs along the river.

4. The organic fertilizers and cultivation methods should be introduced and encouraged with tax incentives to reduce chemical and pesticide discharges from flowing into river.

Unpolluted and clean Muar river is not just for the sake of a better living habitat for fauna and flora and tourism development, but it’s a sole source of drinking water for entire Muar District, a big portion of Ledang District and a reserved reservoir for Melaka state.

While for old buildings protection, the gazette should include old shophouses, school buildings, clan buildings, religious places and unique landmarks besides the government office buildings.

I hope with the Johor royal town’s declaration and the full blessing from the Johor Sultan, local government and residents will take more proactive actions to keep historic Muar city and Muar river in a clean and green environment all the times.

As seen in the FreeMalaysiaToday.com, http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/letters/2012/11/27/muar-town-must-be-kept-clean-and-green/

Johor Ruler wants old buildings in Muar gazetted
By HAMDAN RAJA ABDULLAH

Residents in Muar watching the investiture ceremony on a giant TV screen outside the Diamond Jubilee Hall on Thursday. Starpix by ABDUL RAHMAN EMBONG. Residents in Muar watching the investiture ceremony on a giant TV screen outside the Diamond Jubilee Hall on Thursday. Starpix by ABDUL RAHMAN EMBONG.

MUAR: Johor Ruler Sultan Ibrahim Sultan Iskandar wants the state government to gazette all old buildings in this town as heritage buildings.

He said the buildings, including the Muar High School, the old Muar courthouse, the old Muar post office, the town mosque, the Muar hospital and the old Customs office, were built by Sultan Abu Bakar Sultan Ibrahim.

Speaking at his 54th birthday celebration, he said he decided to celebrate his birthday in Muar as he loved Bandar Maharani which is located along Sungai Muar.

“For the first time, a Johor Ruler decided to celebrate his birthday in Muar and I made history today by being the first Ruler to celebrate his birthday here.

“I picked Muar as the town is rich in history and tradition besides being peaceful, beautiful and progressive,” he said before conferring state awards and old royal titles to his children at the Muar Diamond Jubilee Hall on Thursday.

Sultan Ibrahim, who was accompanied by his consort Raja Zarith Sofia, said Sungai Muar should always be clean and protected.

He urged the state government, the local authorities and the people to ensure the river’s cleanliness.

This, he said, could be done by relocating the bus and taxi terminals elsewhere.

Sultan Ibrahim also announced the revival of old royal titles which he bestowed on his children.

Tunku Abdul Jalil Sultan Ibrahim, was conferred the title of Tunku Laksamana Johor; Tunku Abdul Rahman Sultan Ibrahim the Tunku Panglima Johor; Tunku Abu Bakar Sultan Ibrahim the Tunku Putera Johor; Tunku Idris Iskandar Sultan Ibrahim the Tunku Temenggong Johor; and Tunku Aminah Sultan Ibrahim the Tunku Tun Aminah.

Meanwhile, thousands of residents thronged the roads in the town to witness the ceremony at the Diamond Jubilee Hall.

Those who could not enter the hall watched the celebration and investiture ceremony from five giant screens set up by the municipal council.

428 Bersih 3.0 >>>

Who should be blamed for Bersih 3.0 Sit-in fracas?

Let me use a quantitative method to explain who is the ultimate loser and winner in Bersih 428 Sit-in rally.

For the beginning, PR, BN and Bersih NGOs all are given 100 marks.

Problem 1: Sealing Dataran Merdeka itself is anti-democracy and injustice act made by DBKL and BN without any justification. This is a bad example of using law to to suppress rakyat from using their property.

> Deduct 50% for BN.

Right solution is to let Bersih to use Dataran Merdeka without condition.

Problem 2: Police and FRU used excessive force by spreading teargas and chemical-laced water against invading Bersih protesters. No gold mine in the Dataran Merdeka for FRU to shot anyone with teargas and water cannon.

> Deduct 20% for BN

Right solution is police should just arrest those protesters entering the Dataran, not went amok to spread chemical-laced water and teargas.

Problem 3: FRU ran wild to attack other innocent Bersih protesters and bystanders who were not entering Dataran Merdeka.

> Deduct 10 % for BN

Right solution is to give them stern final warning and 30 minute for them to disperse and go home peacefully.

Problem 4: Police was showing low professional in crowd control and maintaining public order. There are many abuses and brutalities against Bersih protesters captured on tape.

> Deduct 10% for BN

Right solution is to respect reporters and arrest those trouble makers with reasonable forces.

Problem 5: Azmin Ali seemed to have given nod to enter Dataran Merdeka against Bersih’s “No Entry” decision after Ambiga announced the rally was over and asked the crowd to disperse.

See youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCXvqoMK8Bc

> Deduct 30% for PR

Right solution is 100% to obey the court order, although PR might be defected in the battlefield but it would win the war.

Problem 6: PAS Amal security squad lost control on crowds and allowed agent provocateurs to control a small group of aggressive protesters.

> Deduct 20% for PR

Right solution is to install a better quality control on its Amal manpower like using hologram name tag and secret password verification.

Problem 7: Bersih role was hijacked by PR.

> Deduct 20% for Bersih.

Right solution is asking PR to sign an open declaration to accept Bersih decision.

Problem 8: Bersih rejected Stadium Merdeka offer.

> Deduct 10% for Bersih.

Right solution is to accept Stadiun Merdeka offer with a condition attached, that is BN government must allow excess crowd to use Dataran Merdeka.

The final scorecard is BN 10% [ultimate loser]; PR 50% [major loser]; Bersih 70% [minor loser]

These parties appear are losers to some degrees, but BN is the worst loser in the eyes of rakyat and international community.

UMNO is accelerating its own peril and demise with this kind of silliness and cruelty against Malaysians.

Read it from MalaysiaKini, Winners and Losers in Bersih 3.0.

Letter to Newspaper >>>

Foreign tourists pay more for ticket is fair

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/4/10/focus/11075478&sec=focus

I refer to this letter, http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/4/9/focus/11071241&sec=focus which disagree on dual ticketing system for local and foreign tourists.

Dual ticketing system is a standard practice in many countries in Asia. The system is fair to locals who have to bear for huge development costs for tourism infrastructure through taxation like income tax, sales tax, etc.

The amount of tax payable by foreign tourists during their visit is insufficient to cover the overall development cost, therefore higher ticket price for foreign tourists is indirect taxation to reclaim huge cost in infrastructure expenses like a few hundred millions spent on Melaka River beautification project.

Dual ticketing system actually is not a discriminatory policy, but it’s a more balanced and fair policy to recover cost from local and foreign tourists. Besides, cheaper tickets for locals encourage more domestic tourism and reduce the outflow of cash to foreign countries.

Tourists should not be made to pay more

LATELY, there have been many news reports regarding the promotion of Malaysia (and Malacca) as a tourist destination, by the Tourism Ministry and the state government.

The idea is to generate more interest in Malaysia, increase the tourism revenue and at the same time ensure more jobs for locals.

People around the world who have heard about Malaysia book their flights, arrange their accommodation and travel itinerary, and go through the hassle and immigration to finally get here.

These tourists visit our various attractions, such as the zoo in A’Famosa, Malacca Zoo, then onto the Menara Taming Sari or to the Go Kart circuit in Ayer Keroh … and then they realise the “discriminatory clause” that non-MyKad holders have to pay more!

Imagine this scenario: I bring my friend from Hong Kong to the Menara Taming Sari, and while I only have to pay RM15, my friend from Hong Kong has to pay RM25.

So a person who has travelled and spent money to come to Malaysia must now PAY MORE than average to enjoy the views.

Truly, if I was a tourist, I would at least like to have a feeling that I am not being “cheated”.

If I was a tourist, I would not visit Malaysia again.

Possibly that is why, Malaysia is still struggling to be a choice for tourists.

Think about this. You set your priorities/ goals and you create the environment that facilitates them.

RONNIE CHONG,
Malacca.