Categories

Penang >>>

It's absurd for MPPP to tear down overhead bridge just because of no enough pedestrians

KL city is building new overhead bridge for pedestrians while Penang is planning to remove overhead bridge.

The new pedestrian bridge in KL is a huge success. http://mykampung.sinchew.com.my/node/237406

The reasons given by Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and his exco is pedestrians prefer jaywalking and fewer people are using the “octupus” bridge.

bridge

May I suggest Penang government legalize robbing when more people start to rob? Go fine the jaywalkers instead of saying the bridge is not used by them.

Besides, has any study been done to suggest zebras are a better option for crossing the road without causing traffic jam?

LGE and his exco should ask questions themselves why the same bridge in KL is welcome by KLites.

Installing elevators and air-conditioning bridge coupled with strict enforcement on jaywalking will reduce jaywalking habit and restore the intended function of pedestrian bridge.

Locking off the bridge after 12PM is another option to prevent sin activities on the bridge.

Maybe without tearing down an old bridge, MPPP has no excuse to spend taxpayer’s money on new infrastructure.

Penang >>>

Another fxxxing bullshit from Lim Guan Eng. His government approved the project and then blamed the court for unable to stop the project.

sunway-city-project-sg-ara

Sunway city project out of state govt’s hands
Monday, April 08, 2013 – 17:31
by A. Sangeetha

CARETAKER Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the issue of Sunway City Penang Sdn Bhd’s controversial project in Desa Ria, Sungai Ara, was out of the hands of the state government’s due to its legal status.

The residents’ appeal against the project that is to be built on hill land above 250ft is currently being heard at the Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP)’s appeal’s board.

“I cannot overwrite what the court has decided. Yes, we did say that we would not allow the project to take place but if the court decides in favour of the developer, we would have to abide by it,” he said.

In June last year, Lim had given residents in the area the assurance that as long the state government was in power, would not approve the project.

Last week, Sunrise Garden Kondominium management committee chairman S. Manuel Nicholas urged Lim to provide a written assurance as a follow-up to the verbal assurance in June and again in August.

“Of course, we don’t approve projects above 250ft. However, the case is in court now and we have to comply with the directive,” he said.

The project comprising 14 blocks of condominiums ranging between five and 16 floor, 92 units of bungalows and two clubhouses will be built on a 80.9 acres land next to a water catchment area.

The approval for planning permission of project dubbed as a `special project’ was given by MPPP’s One-Stop Centre based on a stringent checklist that was abided by the developer in 2010.

Penang >>>

不理民间团体曹观友等人反对 林冠英强悍反击坚持建海底隧道

The undersea tunnel project is the last straw on the camel which has changed my stand from the neutral to total against Lim Guan Eng. He is another BN-like politician, thus keeping him in the Malaysia political landscape is bad to Malaysia.

The project cost won the bidding is RM 6.30, not 8 billion mentioned in the article.

Penang voters, vote him out and choose a local Penangite to replace him as the chief minister.

lld20130306a

http://www.souminews.com/node/9459

80亿的槟威海底隧道涉及8 亿令吉政治献金被揭发后, 虽然引起包括行政议员曹观友在内的朝野人士和非政府机构的一片反对声浪,但槟首长林冠英还是坚持要加速推行海底隧道计划, 这令更多人相信, 政治献金的确有事实根据。(林思伟)

槟州首长林冠英一意孤行,仓促和私人发展商签订耗资80亿令吉的槟威海底隧道合约,已经引起民间强烈反弹。

州内各非政府机构和民间团体皆不认同林冠英对建立海底隧道的建议仓促作出决定,尤其是行动党槟州主席曹观友更是强烈反对。

《搜秘网》日前根据可靠消息揭露,槟州首长林冠英在大选前仓促决定建立海底隧道,并迅速批准投标工程,其中涉及8亿令吉的政治献金。

消息传开后,行动党的网络炮兵一时乱成一团,不知如何替主子释疑,在网上惯性地掀起粗口谩骂,回敬有关传言;而当事人却故作镇定,不是顾左右而言他就是逃避传媒的追问, 至今尚未对8亿政治献金事作出澄清。

负责槟州交通道路管理委员会的行政议员曹观友日前向身边人表明个人立场,认为海底隧道计划不宜在短期内推行。

槟州政府两年前曾耗费320万令吉公款,聘请AJC策划咨询有限公司与合乐(HALCROW)咨询公司,用了一年半的时间完成了一项槟州交通大蓝图的研究报告。

该报告去年10月公布时,负责槟州交通道路管理委员会的行政议员曹观友在记者会上表明,这份报告认为,海底隧道计划不宜在短期内推行。

槟州政府花费了320万令吉聘专家完成的报告,已经慎重劝告槟州政府不得急于建海底隧道,但是首长林冠英却还是一意孤行,迫不及待的授标给由北京城建集团与本地公司组成的联营公司Consortium Zenith BUCG私人有限公司,要在2015年动工兴建海底隧道,并须赶在2020年建好。

和林冠英面和心不和的曹观友认为,槟州政府应该在2015至2020年期间才开始进行检视海底隧道计划的可行性研究,不宜将之列为须优先推行的计划。

他说,咨询公司曾建议州政府,在兴建海底隧道之前的10年内, 必须先做好准备工作,尤其重要的是先展开耗时3至5年的交通研究报告,包括隧道出入口、交通疏散系统、道路基本设施等。

曹观友说,海底隧道计划应该在2020年至2030年进行详细的设计工作,过后才能开始兴建。

这即是说,如果真的要建海底隧道,也是在2030年过后的事。

可是,林冠英现在却已迫不及待的授标给Consortium Zenith BUCG私人有限公司 ,以赶在2020年便将海底隧道建起来。他也宣布动用州政府的填海土地给承包工程的公司, 但是林冠英却不敢宣布车辆使用隧道的收费多少,民间团体认为其中涉及黑箱作业的成份很高。

槟城消费人公会和许多环保团体认为,海底隧道如同多打开一个缺口让更多车辆涌入槟岛,令槟岛的交通堵塞情况加速恶化、它也会影响槟威海峡未来的海运和物流业的发展。

除此之外,海底隧道除了加剧槟岛的交通阻塞情况,更会造成槟岛的屋价飙升,将来只有富人才有能力住在槟岛,中低收入者都必须搬到威南,与外劳做邻居。

因为林冠英准备将位于丹绒槟榔的110英亩填海地送给Consortium Zenith BUCG私人有限公司,以换取耗资80亿令吉的海底隧道。

这片面积110英亩的填海地目前还是一片泥沼,尚未填土就已值80亿令吉(每平方尺价值1669令吉),当完成填土及其他基设工程,每平方尺肯定超过2500令吉。

这么昂贵的地价,当然只能用来盖大洋楼或高级豪华公寓,槟城中低收入的人民将望楼兴叹。

值得一提的是,曹观友去年在宣布槟州交通大蓝图报告拟就时曾强调,槟州政府聘请顾问公司为槟州制定未来20年的交通大蓝图,旨在令未来交通规划朝向“不靠汽车移动人民”的发展。

可是,林冠英现在花了320万令吉公款聘请咨询公司拟就了交通大蓝图报告后,却不听从咨询公司的劝告,坚持要“靠汽车移动人民”。

林冠英作为一州之长, 却把专业人士的报告当儿戏,已经引起多个非政府组织组的愤怒。

由多个非政府机构组成的《槟城论坛》之督导委员会,最近和林冠英在对话会上进行了超过两小时的激烈争执,甚至连曹观友也一样对林冠英一意孤行的做法表示反感。

据行动党本土派消息透露,曹观友最近在《光华日报》写的专栏“试5年,死5年?”,里头有一段就是刻意嘲讽林冠英践踏民意而写的。

这段文字是这样写的:

“。。。这教训让我们知道必须时时与人民保持联系,了解他们要的是什麽。若你能够赢得民心,也就能够打赢这场战。但通常政治人物会自以为他们懂的比人民多,但提出的种种竞选承诺,却往往无法反映出人民真正的期望。。。。”

据说,林冠英在面对《槟城论坛》督导委员会的责难下,最后悻悻然的说,民联槟州政府将会让160万槟城人决定,他们是否要民联政府耗资80亿令吉推行的海底隧道。

160万名槟城人怎样做决定?原来林冠英是要用海底隧道捆绑民意,把槟州选民投选民联当成人民支持海底隧道。

《槟城论坛》督导委员会当然知道他会使出这一招,所以委员之一的著名部落客阿尼尔涅多,以及槟城古迹信托会委员卢林玲理就当场警告林冠英,勿捆绑民意及假借反国阵的情绪来推行海底隧道计划。

从目前的情况看来,一向傲慢自大的林冠英,尽管面对许多反对声音, 他仓促批准海底隧道的决定坚决,这就更加说明了8 亿政治献金并非空穴来风,而是有一定的事实根据,更何况林冠英父子在这个课题上一直保持低调和回避,更令人怀疑他们有不可告人的秘密

Penang >>>

Lim Guan Eng said 'It was typo' to explain discrepancy in costing

typo

Add up four items from 1 to 4 is 4.08 billion. I do not know which number is wrong due to typo.

The initial costing of 4.08 billion raised to RM6.30 billion is due to TYPO is truly a mind boggling issue in any country except in China and North Korea.

BN politicians are greedy and corrupt, they always avoid to answer the costing question. But “Typo” is never a better answer than no answer.

Typo reply is fully reserved for another FXXX remark.

Action needed on shocking cost hike on tunnel

FMT LETTER: From Ong Eu Soon, via e-mail

While others took years to plan for tunnel related projects, Lim Guan Eng with little or virtually no knowledge on tunnelling took only months to plan. The tunnel had been sought under the pretext of easing congestion on the island, but the exit point of the tunnel at Gurney Drive threatens to turn the place into a choke point in the island’s transportation network.

In his speech to investors at the Penang Investment Seminar on Sept 13, 2011 at Rasa Sayang Hotel, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng has shared the mega infrastructure projects estimate to cost RM4 billion. The following is the excerpt of his speech:

I wish to share with you some of the major infrastructure projects that we have planned for Penang.

1 The Penang Third Link or the Penang-Butterworth Tunnel. This 6.5 km stretch will be a undersea subway tunnel linking Gurney Drive on Penang Island with Bagan Ajam in Seberang Perai North District. Estimated to cost RM1.95 billion, this 3rd link will improve connectivity and meet travel demands from the island to mainland

2 The Gurney Drive-Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu by-pass. This 4.2 km stretch will link Gurney Drive with Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu via Pangkor Road, Perak Road and Sungai Pinang Road. Costing at RM630 million, this by-pass will connect the northern fringes of George Town to the eastern corridor of the island circumventing the Central Business District.

3 Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu-Bandar Baru Air Itam by-pass. This 4.6 km stretch will link Bandar Baru Air Itam (Farlim) with Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu with interchanges at Bandar Baru Air Itam, Jalan Yeap Chor Ee, Jalan Sultan Azlan Shah and Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu, near the Penang Bridge. Estimated to cost RM920 million, this by-pass is anticipated to reduce traffic congestion on the local roads.

4 Tanjung Bunga-Batu Feringgi-Teluk Bahang Paired Road. Stretching for 12km, this road will be parallel to the existing coastal road from Tanjung Bunga to Teluk Bahang. Estimated to cost RM580 million, the paired road will reduce traffic congestion on the existing North Coastal Road and accommodate generated traffic from new developments.

The speech was made five months after signing a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with China in April 2011 on the possibility of building three road and tunnel projects in the island state

Hardly a year later the cost of the projects skyrocket to a RM6.3billion. As I have pointed out earlier that the proposed projects have not been through the required public selection processes for consultants and bidders, environmental studies, public hearings, design completion and independent reviews.

It does not have a detailed, bottom-up cost estimate. It does not even spell out the number of lanes that the tunnel will have. Nor even the depth of the tunnel is specified in order to avoid causing impact to the navigation of vessels plying the Penang Port.

Without a preliminary engineering study, there is insufficient information to complete a level of tunnel design that can be used to estimate the final cost. Guan Eng’s carefree attitude on the project cost overrun can only be explained by this exorbitant cost hike within a short span of time.

The earlier cost estimate projected a maximum final cost of RM4 billion, RM2.3 billion lower than what he had projected after the award of the tender. The state government should come clean with the exorbitant cost hike with a detail bottom up cost estimation to allay fears of abuse of power.

The state government should conduct two independent estimates of costs for the projects and have an analysis of comparable tunnel construction costs at a tunnel which will utilise design and technology similar to that proposed for the projects.

It is of paramount important for the Penang state government to provide us with a unique opportunity to undertake comparative costing of our estimates with current market data if the slogan on corruption eradication by Pakatan is of any meaning.

A system assisting in the early cost estimation of road tunnels would therefore be of great value as it would allow the quick costing of alternative and more economical solutions. The basic parameters, i.e. geological, geometrical, and work quantities-related, affecting temporary and permanent support and final construction cost should be determined.

Without the eventual design work for cost estimation, there is no way to know whether the actual costs be lower or higher. Guan Eng should put the projects on hold pending a preliminary engineering study and design. The estimate cost based on multiple bids solicited for the projects can not be used as it tend to be exorbitant in nature judging from the serious lack of preliminary study.

Guan Eng is making a mockery of repeated claims about his open tender. The tender of the projects is not in keeping with normal government tendering. It is not registered in the e-Perolehan. He should make available copies of tenders for public viewing. We need to know the key information contained in the tenders includes the government’s estimates of the costs and the scope of projects.

It is scandalous for Lim Guan Eng to proceed with the projects by ignoring all the irregularities that emerged from the tender process.

Penang >>>

I waste money is ok because I am Lim Guan Eng...If you're no happy go vote me out.

PBA Group

PBAPP is one of three 100% owned subsidiaries of PBA Holdings Bhd (PBAHB), a company that is listed in the Main Board of the Malaysian Bourse (Bursa Malaysia).

Lim Guan Eng is the non-executive chairman of PBA Holdings, http://www.pbahb.com.my/info.html

This is another typo for paying RM 63,000 per month for unused office I believe.

Penang water supplier slammed over RM70,000 office rental

by Zalinah Noordin

A GROUP of disgruntled Penangites have resorted to lodging a police report against the Penang Water Supply Corporation (PBAPP) for allegedly wasting funds by renting an office space for RM70,000 a month since March last year.

Group spokesperson Zainudin Jaafar said that as PBAPP consumers, it is the people’s right to question where the money is channelled.

“We hope the police will investigate this matter thoroughly,” said Zainudin, who went to the police beat base in Komtar with some 20 other dissatisfied people.

Also present was 1Malaysia Brothers chairman Khoo Boo Eam, who said that PBAPP should not waste the people’s money by renting the space and not utilising it.

“If they (PBAPP) have been renting it since March, then more than RM800,000 have been wasted,” said Khoo.

The group then proceeded to the state Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission headquarters in Jalan Sultan Ahmad Shah to lodge another report.

Penang MACC director Datuk M. Samarajoo confirmed receiving the report.

“We will conduct the necessary investigations,” said Samarajoo.

The issue came to light after it was reported by a local news station (Buletin Utama — TV3).

In the bulletin, state Umno deputy chief Datuk Musa Sheikh Fadzir had questioned the rationale behind PBAPP’s decision to rent the space for almost a year despite not using it.

“It is appalling that PBAPP has rented the empty office space for almost a year at a fee of RM70,000 a month. “This means that almost RM1 million of PBAPP’s and the people’s money was wasted,” Musa said.

It is believed that the office space, located on the fourth floor in Komtar, was rented by PBAPP from a private company.

It is also learnt that an open tender was called twice to choose the suitable contractor for the renovations but all bidders were rejected.

PBAPP general manager Jaseni Maidinsa could not be reached for comments.